Report an error
Score of the US Open Golf Winner correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in South Dakota | r=0.85 | 10yrs | No |
Points scored by the Los Angeles Chargers | r=0.85 | 6yrs | No |
The number of receptionists in Hawaii | r=0.68 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Banco Santander's stock price (SAN) | r=0.6 | 21yrs | No |
BP's stock price (BP) | r=0.59 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Johanna | r=0.58 | 33yrs | No |
Score of the US Open Golf Winner also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)