Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'headache remedies' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Brielle | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
The number of physician assistants in Kansas | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Falkland Islands | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Congo-Brazzaville | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
The price of gold | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
The number of registered nurses in Missouri | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Rex | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
Blue cheese consumption | r=0.93 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Juliet | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
The number of bakers in Florida | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.89 | 18yrs | No |
The number of college administrators in South Carolina | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
The number of actuaries in New York | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Indianapolis Colts | r=0.75 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'headache remedies' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)