Report an error
Master's degrees awarded in Precision production correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of surgens in Virginia | r=0.95 | 7yrs | No |
Total likes of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos | r=0.88 | 7yrs | No |
The average number of likes on 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos | r=0.87 | 7yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Whole Foods | r=0.85 | 9yrs | No |
The number of paralegals in Hawaii | r=0.85 | 9yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Macy's | r=0.8 | 9yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Rite Aid | r=0.78 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Czechia | r=0.75 | 10yrs | No |
The number of social work teachers in Pennsylvania | r=0.67 | 10yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Lesotho | r=0.64 | 10yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Nepal | r=0.64 | 10yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Kroger | r=0.48 | 9yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Precision production also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)