Report an error
Master's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of fashion designers in Wisconsin | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
The number of college sociology teachers in Nebraska | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
The number of surgens in California | r=0.94 | 7yrs | No |
Maria Sharapova's WTA Title Count | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Equivocation | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Jamaica | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
Number of viewers of Victoria's Secret Fashion Show | r=0.87 | 7yrs | No |
UFO sightings in California | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
Viewership of Doctor Who season finale | r=0.86 | 10yrs | No |
How trendy LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.83 | 7yrs | No |
Google searches for 'minecraft' | r=0.8 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'hottest man on earth' | r=0.8 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to do magic' | r=0.75 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Taylor Swift' | r=0.71 | 10yrs | No |
Number of pirate attacks in Indonesia | r=0.69 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)