Report an error
Master's degrees awarded in Biological and biomedical sciences correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=1 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'tummy ache' | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Average length of OverSimplified YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 6yrs | No |
| Average number of comments on Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to learn python' | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'ice bath' | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Cheddar cheese consumption | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'harry potter' | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of airline pilots, copilots, and flight engineers in Iowa | r=0.79 | 10yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Biological and biomedical sciences also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)