Report an error
Number of public school students in Kindergarten correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of first-line retail sales supervisors in Connecticut | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
| Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
| US production of cream products | r=0.95 | 7yrs | No |
| Jet fuel used in Suriname | r=0.92 | 32yrs | Yes! |
| Annual count of part-time employees in the United States | r=0.91 | 33yrs | No |
| The price of gold | r=0.88 | 25yrs | No |
| The number of lifeguards and ski patrol in Ohio | r=0.88 | 19yrs | No |
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.85 | 32yrs | No |
| Points scored by the New England Patriots | r=0.83 | 33yrs | No |
| Total Points scored by the New England Patriots in the NFL season | r=0.83 | 33yrs | No |
| Customer satisfaction with Apple | r=0.82 | 28yrs | Yes! |
| UFO sightings in Florida | r=0.81 | 32yrs | No |
| Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States | r=0.74 | 32yrs | No |
Number of public school students in Kindergarten also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
