Report an error
Bachelor's degrees awarded in information sciences correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| UnitedHealth Group's stock price (UNH) | r=1 | 10yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in United States | r=1 | 10yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Arthur | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Antigua and Barbuda | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| Ameren's stock price (AEE) | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in Kazakhstan | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| Nasdaq's stock price (NDAQ) | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on beef | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in information sciences also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)