Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Psychology correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Beau | r=1 | 11yrs | No |
| Renewable energy production in China | r=1 | 11yrs | No |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
| Median US Household Income | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'reddit' | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| PepsiCo's stock price (PEP) | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Eli Lilly and Company's stock price (LLY) | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| Annual Revenue of Walt Disney Company | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to learn python' | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'roblox' | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Electronic Arts' stock price (EA) | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s stock price (JPM) | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Points scored by the Kansas City Chiefs | r=0.77 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Psychology also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)