Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total Digital Music Single Downloads | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Drew | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
The number of butchers in Pennsylvania | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'facebook' | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Cenovus Energy's stock price (CVE) | r=0.98 | 11yrs | Yes! |
The number of marriage therapists in Virginia | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'zombies' | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Burglary rates in the US | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ethan | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Arson in Massachusetts | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)