Report an error
Maria Sharapova's WTA Title Count correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
The number of farm equipment mechanics in New Hampshire | r=0.93 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions | r=0.9 | 6yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Zambia | r=0.73 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Nuclear power generation in France | r=0.69 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'panama canal' | r=0.68 | 14yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Mars and the Sun | r=0.49 | 15yrs | No |
Maria Sharapova's WTA Title Count also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)