Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Practical nursing correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of CEOs in Oregon | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| The number of receptionists in North Dakota | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents in Nebraska | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Drew | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Ticket sales for Cincinnati Reds games | r=0.94 | 9yrs | No |
| The average age of batters for the New York Yankees | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of movies Channing Tatum appeared in | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
| Global revenue generated by McDonald's | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
| The average age of batters for the Los Angeles Dodgers | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Ukraine | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
| The marriage rate in Wyoming | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Singapore | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'bazinga' meme | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
| United States' Fruit Juice Export Volume | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Practical nursing also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)