Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in linguistics correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Electricity generation in Angola | r=0.99 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Yum! Brands' stock price (YUM) | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Peru | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Los Angeles Dodgers' Win/Loss Percentage in National League West Division | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to learn python' | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Paypal's Number of Active Registered User Accounts | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Total comments on Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Verizon Communications' stock price (VZ) | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
SAP SE's stock price (SAP) | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Cost to send a letter via the USPS | r=0.95 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Season wins for the Cleveland Browns | r=0.64 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Associates degrees awarded in linguistics also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)