Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Engineering technologies correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Sheldon | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
The number of aerospace engineers in California | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Kerosene used globally | r=0.96 | 11yrs | Yes! |
The divorce rate in Arkansas | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Adrien | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Japan | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'daylight savings time' | r=0.95 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Burglary rates in the US | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'xkcd' | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Bankruptcy filings in the US | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Engineering technologies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)