Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Engineering correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Number of internet users | r=1 | 6yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'reddit' | r=0.98 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Average length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Dollar Tree's stock price (DLTR) | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of physicists in Michigan | r=0.96 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Lockheed Martin's stock price (LMT) | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Air quality in Shreveport, Louisiana | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
| 3M Company's stock price (MMM) | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Engineering also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)