Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Business administration correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Electricity generation in Bolivia | r=0.99 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of sales managers in New York | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| US GDP per capita | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'reddit' | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are | r=0.94 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Points scored by the Kansas City Chiefs | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of private detectives in Ohio | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Business administration also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)