Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Agriculture correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of special education teachers in Alaska | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'chuck norris' meme | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Australia | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Saudi Arabia | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.86 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final | r=0.62 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Associates degrees awarded in Agriculture also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)