Report an error
The number of marriage therapists in New York correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
London Gold Prices | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
How professional-sounding 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are | r=0.93 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Hispanic cheese consumption | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Total likes of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
The number of marriage therapists in New York also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)