Report an error
The number of cartographers in New York correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in Gabon | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Zendaya appeared in | r=0.88 | 12yrs | No |
Global iPod Sales | r=0.88 | 9yrs | No |
Asthma attacks in American children | r=0.86 | 17yrs | No |
Geothermal power generated in Austria | r=0.86 | 16yrs | No |
UK Public Library Count | r=0.86 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Felisha | r=0.84 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Asthma attacks in American children | r=0.81 | 17yrs | No |
Asthma attacks in American children | r=0.79 | 17yrs | No |
Google searches for 'suez canal' | r=0.79 | 19yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Transportation | r=0.78 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Meaghan | r=0.77 | 18yrs | No |
US Hospital Occupancy Rate | r=0.75 | 17yrs | No |
Average length of Matt Parker's YouTube videos | r=0.66 | 12yrs | No |
Average length of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.61 | 12yrs | No |
The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in | r=0.54 | 20yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=-0.87 | 18yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=-0.88 | 18yrs | No |
The number of cartographers in New York also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)