Report an error
The number of actuaries in New York correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Nuclear power generation in Romania | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
The price of gold | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.92 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Air quality in Watertown, New York | r=0.89 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.88 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'headache remedies' | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you' | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Air quality in New York City | r=0.84 | 20yrs | No |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.84 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i cant even' | r=0.84 | 19yrs | No |
Air quality in Jamestown, New York | r=0.83 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i am tired' | r=0.82 | 19yrs | No |
Blue cheese consumption | r=0.81 | 19yrs | No |
The number of actuaries in New York also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)