Report an error
Sewage sludge used for fertilizer in the US correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Alabama | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in The Bahamas | r=0.98 | 6yrs | No |
Google searches for 'sleepwalking' | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme | r=0.89 | 9yrs | Yes! |
The number of school teachers in Vermont | r=0.87 | 6yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in South Carolina | r=0.86 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Gasoline pumped in Madagascar | r=0.77 | 30yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'best breed of dog' | r=0.76 | 12yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Idaho | r=0.74 | 30yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Michael Cera appeared in | r=0.72 | 17yrs | No |
Air quality in Barnstable Town, Massachusetts | r=0.69 | 29yrs | No |
Sewage sludge used for fertilizer in the US also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)