Report an error
The number of accountants and auditors in New York correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Google searches for 'reddit' | r=0.94 | 15yrs | No | 
| Italian-type cheese consumption | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No | 
| Inflation in the US | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No | 
| Google searches for 'cold shower' | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No | 
| Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.91 | 17yrs | No | 
| Restaurant spending in New York | r=0.91 | 18yrs | No | 
| McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No | 
The number of accountants and auditors in New York also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
