Report an error
UFO sightings in Alaska correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme | r=0.92 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Annabelle | r=0.9 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Jet fuel used in Brazil | r=0.85 | 42yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.84 | 46yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'batman' | r=0.81 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme | r=0.77 | 15yrs | No |
Automotive recalls for issues with the Power Train | r=0.77 | 47yrs | Yes! |
USA Population | r=0.76 | 47yrs | No |
Total number of live births in Australia | r=0.74 | 47yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Honda | r=0.74 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.73 | 43yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Alaska also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)