Report an error
UFO sightings in Mississippi correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Camden | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.88 | 46yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.87 | 24yrs | No |
Geothermal power generated in Italy | r=0.87 | 42yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.86 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Nuclear power generation in Brazil | r=0.85 | 40yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Saturn | r=0.84 | 47yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Honda | r=0.83 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Global plane crashes | r=0.69 | 47yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in United States | r=0.68 | 47yrs | No |
The number of movies Timothy Spall appeared in | r=0.48 | 44yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Mississippi also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)