Report an error
UFO sightings in Kansas correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Reagan | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Zoe | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.91 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Owen | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Lily | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Lilly | r=0.89 | 47yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.87 | 43yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.85 | 42yrs | No |
Annual count of part-time employees in the United States | r=0.81 | 32yrs | No |
Nuclear power generation in Finland | r=0.71 | 42yrs | No |
Hot days in Toronto | r=0.52 | 15yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Kansas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)