Report an error
Google's Annual Global Revenue correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Roper Technologies' stock price (ROP) | r=1 | 21yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Ruth | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
| American cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| Adobe's stock price (ADBE) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Alphabet's stock price (GOOGL) | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
| Annual Revenue of Walt Disney Company | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Taiwan | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in South Africa | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| Biomass power generated in Japan | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'do vaccines work' | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
Google's Annual Global Revenue also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)