Report an error
UFO sightings in South Carolina correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Annabelle | r=0.93 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.92 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Elsa | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
Global plane crashes | r=0.79 | 47yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.76 | 47yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.75 | 43yrs | No |
Air quality in Columbia, South Carolina | r=0.65 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in South Carolina also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)