Report an error
UFO sightings in Virginia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Sadie | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Zoey | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Virginia | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Ecuador | r=0.92 | 42yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.91 | 24yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.91 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Alivia | r=0.88 | 47yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.86 | 32yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.84 | 43yrs | Yes! |
USA Population | r=0.84 | 47yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.83 | 42yrs | No |
US kids in public school | r=0.79 | 32yrs | No |
Air quality in Richmond, Virginia | r=0.76 | 42yrs | No |
Formula One World Drivers' Champion's Point Margin | r=0.6 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Virginia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)