Report an error
UFO sightings in New Jersey correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Avery | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in U.S. Pacific Islands | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Phoebe | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Nicaragua | r=0.9 | 42yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.89 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.88 | 32yrs | No |
UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count | r=0.75 | 47yrs | No |
The number of movies Scarlett Johansson appeared in | r=0.58 | 28yrs | No |
UFO sightings in New Jersey also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)