Report an error
UFO sightings in North Carolina correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Annabelle | r=0.97 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Aubrey | r=0.95 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Mason | r=0.95 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Zoey | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Annabel | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.92 | 37yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.88 | 32yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Isabella | r=0.86 | 47yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.84 | 43yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.84 | 47yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.82 | 42yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Dillard's | r=0.82 | 27yrs | No |
Global plane crashes | r=0.77 | 47yrs | No |
Annual Revenue of Walt Disney Company | r=0.7 | 31yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and the Sun | r=0.66 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in North Carolina also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)