Report an error
The number of statisticians in New Jersey correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme | r=0.96 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Hydopower energy generated in Turkmenistan | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'press f to pay respects' meme | r=0.91 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'its wednesday my dudes' meme | r=0.89 | 17yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Cook Islands | r=0.88 | 19yrs | No |
Restaurant spending in New Jersey | r=0.76 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.75 | 19yrs | No |
The number of statisticians in New Jersey also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)