Report an error
Asthma attacks in American children correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| The number of first-line retail sales supervisors in Minnesota | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No | 
| The number of computer network architects in Virginia | r=0.96 | 8yrs | No | 
| Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo | r=0.86 | 12yrs | No | 
| US household spending on mortgage interest and charges | r=0.79 | 20yrs | Yes! | 
| Arson in Ohio | r=0.79 | 23yrs | No | 
| Arson in Maine | r=0.74 | 23yrs | No | 
| Brick cheese consumption | r=0.67 | 23yrs | No | 
| China's Unemployment Rate | r=0.65 | 16yrs | No | 
| Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series | r=0.63 | 17yrs | No | 
| Total runs scored in the World Series | r=0.59 | 17yrs | No | 
| Arson in Florida | r=0.5 | 23yrs | No | 
Asthma attacks in American children also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
