Report an error
Asthma attacks in American children correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The divorce rate in Wisconsin | r=0.9 | 21yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Michigan | r=0.87 | 21yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Idaho | r=0.86 | 21yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Texas | r=0.86 | 21yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Mississippi | r=0.85 | 21yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Nebraska | r=0.85 | 21yrs | No |
China's Unemployment Rate | r=0.81 | 16yrs | No |
The number of cartographers in New York | r=0.79 | 17yrs | No |
US household spending on dairy products | r=0.79 | 20yrs | No |
Arson in Florida | r=0.67 | 23yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Mars | r=-0.69 | 23yrs | No |
Asthma attacks in American children also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)