Report an error
Asthma attacks in American children correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of nurse anesthetists in North Dakota | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 6yrs | No |
The number of orderlies in New Mexico | r=0.95 | 8yrs | No |
The number of special education teachers in Massachusetts | r=0.92 | 8yrs | No |
Air quality in Central City, Kentucky | r=0.88 | 6yrs | No |
How 'hip and with it' Extra History YouTube video titles are | r=0.86 | 8yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton in Missouri | r=0.83 | 15yrs | Yes! |
How nerdy MrBeast's YouTube video titles are | r=0.82 | 8yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Architecture | r=0.8 | 8yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Japan | r=0.76 | 23yrs | No |
Air quality in Sandpoint, Idaho | r=0.76 | 23yrs | No |
The number of movies Jack Nicholson appeared in | r=0.45 | 23yrs | No |
Asthma attacks in American children also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)