Report an error
Asthma attacks in American children correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of childcare workers in Alabama | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
US production of fluid beverage milk | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
The number of bill collectors in Minnesota | r=0.92 | 17yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
US dairy skim solids used to produce milk fat and skim solids byproduct fluid beverage milk | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
Burglaries in Tennessee | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
Burglaries in Kentucky | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
Burglaries in Ohio | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Michigan | r=0.89 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Tristen | r=0.89 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Jamar | r=0.88 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alyson | r=0.87 | 23yrs | No |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
US average milk-fat content of milk fat and skim solids byproduct fluid beverage milk | r=0.85 | 20yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.83 | 23yrs | No |
The number of cartographers in New York | r=0.81 | 17yrs | No |
Google searches for 'funny cat videos' | r=-0.88 | 16yrs | No |
Asthma attacks in American children also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)