Report an error
Asthma prevalence in American children correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of labor relations specialists in Ohio | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Architecture | r=0.96 | 8yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Bermuda | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Earth | r=0.93 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Tristyn | r=0.93 | 17yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and the Sun | r=0.92 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Chloe | r=0.91 | 17yrs | No |
Robberies in West Virginia | r=0.9 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Adrian | r=0.88 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nathalie | r=0.87 | 17yrs | No |
The number of obstetricians and gynecologists in Oregon | r=0.87 | 17yrs | Yes! |
GMO use in corn grown in Michigan | r=0.86 | 17yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Education | r=0.85 | 9yrs | No |
Asthma prevalence in American children also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)