Report an error
Automotive recalls issued by Ford Motor Company correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Global Rice Consumption | r=0.97 | 14yrs | Yes! |
The Hershey Company's stock price (HSY) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Slovenia | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
The number of dentists in South Carolina | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
O'Reilly Automotive's stock price (ORLY) | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
Google searches for 'ice bath' | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
The number of special education teachers in District of Columbia | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Belgium | r=0.91 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'buy a house' | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
Low-fat and nonfat ice cream products consumption | r=0.45 | 32yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Ford Motor Company also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)