Report an error
Automotive recalls for issues with the Power Train correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
UFO sightings in Colorado | r=0.91 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Liam | r=0.89 | 48yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Wyoming | r=0.87 | 47yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Alaska | r=0.77 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Logan | r=0.68 | 48yrs | No |
The number of movies Emma Thompson appeared in | r=0.59 | 41yrs | No |
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.57 | 43yrs | No |
Automotive recalls for issues with the Power Train also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)