Report an error
Age of the director who won the Best Picture award correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How clickbait-y 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are | r=0.87 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Precision production | r=0.8 | 10yrs | No |
The number of home appliance repairers in Kansas | r=0.76 | 20yrs | No |
Global iPod Sales | r=0.72 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to treat a snake bite' | r=0.69 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' | r=0.65 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Swiss cheese consumption | r=0.59 | 27yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jabari | r=0.47 | 48yrs | No |
Age of the director who won the Best Picture award also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)