Report an error
New York Times Fiction Best Sellers correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Lilly | r=0.92 | 40yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Hawaii | r=0.92 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Julian | r=0.92 | 40yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.9 | 36yrs | Yes! |
The number of microbiologists in North Carolina | r=0.9 | 12yrs | Yes! |
The number of medical equipment repairers in Maine | r=0.9 | 12yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Texas | r=0.9 | 40yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Michigan | r=0.89 | 40yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Missouri | r=0.88 | 40yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Illinois | r=0.87 | 40yrs | Yes! |
Andy Murray's ATP final appearances | r=0.85 | 10yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Nevada | r=0.82 | 40yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Maine | r=0.81 | 40yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Florida | r=0.81 | 40yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Dominican Republic | r=0.73 | 35yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Johnny Depp appeared in | r=0.6 | 31yrs | No |
New York Times Fiction Best Sellers also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)