Report an error
Brad Pitt's net worth correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Air quality in Marquette, Michigan | r=1 | 7yrs | No |
| Greece's annual import volume | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
| Liquefied petroleum gas used in United States | r=0.95 | 36yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Johnny Depp' | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
| Votes for Democratic Senators in Ohio | r=0.89 | 6yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky | r=0.88 | 15yrs | Yes! |
| The number of bakers in Nebraska | r=0.84 | 20yrs | No |
| Lionel Messi's goal count for Argentina | r=0.72 | 17yrs | No |
| Rain in Sydney | r=0.71 | 23yrs | No |
| The number of movies Vin Diesel appeared in | r=0.65 | 36yrs | No |
| Votes for Democratic Senators in Alaska | r=0.65 | 6yrs | No |
| The number of movies Marilyn Monroe appeared in | r=0.51 | 36yrs | No |
Brad Pitt's net worth also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)