Report an error
Paypal's Number of Active Registered User Accounts correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Visa Inc.'s stock price (V) | r=1 | 13yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Malcolm | r=0.99 | 13yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'roblox' | r=0.99 | 13yrs | No |
| Renewable energy production in Antigua and Barbuda | r=0.99 | 12yrs | Yes! |
| Average number of comments on Technology Connections YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Number of highschoolers in the US | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'best colleges' | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to immigrate to switzerland' | r=0.83 | 13yrs | No |
Paypal's Number of Active Registered User Accounts also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)