Report an error
Microsoft's Worldwide Earnings correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Solar power generated in Israel | r=0.98 | 13yrs | No |
| Ecolab's stock price (ECL) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Kazakhstan | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Air Products and Chemicals' stock price (APD) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Cost to send a letter via the USPS | r=0.97 | 17yrs | No |
| Hispanic cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| Alphabet's stock price (GOOGL) | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
| Nuclear power generation in China | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in United Kingdom | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
| QUALCOMM's stock price (QCOM) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
| eBay Inc.'s stock price (EBAY) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
Microsoft's Worldwide Earnings also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)