Report an error
US Wind Power Generation Capacity correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total wind power generated globally | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
US GDP per capita | r=0.99 | 14yrs | No |
Annual Revenue of the Lego Group | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.98 | 23yrs | No |
The Coca-Cola Company's stock price (KO) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Denmark | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Switzerland | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
Colgate-Palmolive Company's stock price (CL) | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on poultry | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Warren | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on eggs | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Kazakhstan | r=0.93 | 22yrs | No |
Air quality in Chicago | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
US Wind Power Generation Capacity also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)