Report an error
Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the 'drake' meme | r=1 | 7yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'success kid' meme | r=1 | 7yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'chuck norris' meme | r=0.99 | 7yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'aint nobody got time for that' meme | r=0.98 | 7yrs | No |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY) | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'cute cats' | r=0.95 | 9yrs | No |
| The number of movies Channing Tatum appeared in | r=0.91 | 8yrs | No |
| Customer satisfaction with Kohl's | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)