Report an error
Arson in Texas correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Rachel | r=0.99 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Joseph | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Maegan | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Texas | r=0.98 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The number of middle school teachers in Texas | r=0.98 | 13yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Earth | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Catherine | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nicholas | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sean | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kristofer | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Martin | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jared | r=0.93 | 38yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Britney Spears' | r=0.92 | 15yrs | No |
Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Texas | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Texas | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
US household spending on beef | r=0.86 | 23yrs | No |
Air pollution in Houston | r=0.8 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Arson in Texas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)