Report an error
Annual US household spending on healthcare correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Colgate-Palmolive Company's stock price (CL) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
3M Company's stock price (MMM) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
AvalonBay Communities' stock price (AVB) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada' | r=0.85 | 19yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on healthcare also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)