Report an error
Annual US household spending on alcoholic beverages correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Rhode Island | r=0.93 | 6yrs | Yes! |
The number of truck drivers in New York | r=0.92 | 13yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Colombia | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in Colombia | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption globally | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
US per-person consumption of bottled water | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
The number of septic tank servicers and sewer pipe cleaners in New Hampshire | r=0.89 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Natural cheese consumption | r=0.88 | 22yrs | No |
Total likes of The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.87 | 14yrs | No |
Average Cost of a 30-Second Ad Commercial during the Academy Awards | r=0.87 | 21yrs | No |
Total number of automotive recalls | r=0.84 | 23yrs | No |
Global Permanent Nuclear Reactor Shutdowns | r=0.55 | 18yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on alcoholic beverages also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)