Report an error
Annual US household spending on bakery products correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| American Tower's stock price (AMT) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Deere & Company's stock price (DE) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Lululemon's stock price (LULU) | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
| Intuitive Surgical's stock price (ISRG) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Parker-Hannifin's stock price (PH) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Caterpillar's stock price (CAT) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
| Rockwell Automation's stock price (ROK) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Eaton Corporation's stock price (ETN) | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
| Nasdaq's stock price (NDAQ) | r=0.93 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| Albemarle's stock price (ALB) | r=0.93 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
| QUALCOMM's stock price (QCOM) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Votes for Democratic Senators in Alabama | r=0.86 | 6yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on bakery products also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)