Additional Info: I wrote a Python script using Astropy to calculate the distance between the named planets on the first day of each month for every year.
Report an error
The distance between Mercury and Earth correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of social workers in Idaho | r=0.9 | 13yrs | Yes! |
| Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers | r=0.89 | 7yrs | No |
| Votes for Libertarian Senators in New Hampshire | r=0.88 | 11yrs | No |
| Average number of comments on PBS Space Time YouTube videos | r=0.76 | 9yrs | No |
| Average length of OverSimplified YouTube videos | r=0.74 | 7yrs | No |
| The number of veterinary assistants in North Dakota | r=0.62 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| Solar power generated in Afghanistan | r=0.61 | 12yrs | No |
| Renewable energy production in The Bahamas | r=0.59 | 12yrs | No |
| Rain in Paris | r=0.52 | 17yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'funny cat videos' | r=0.46 | 20yrs | No |
| Number of times 2 was a winning Mega Millions number | r=0.46 | 19yrs | No |
| Total length of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=-0.78 | 12yrs | No |
The distance between Mercury and Earth also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)