Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
NIKE, Inc.'s stock price (NKE) correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Maeve | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Stevie | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Ruth | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Total solar power generated globally | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Global Puma Sales | r=0.97 | 17yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Cost to send a letter via the USPS | r=0.94 | 17yrs | No |
| Number of websites on the internet | r=0.93 | 17yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
NIKE, Inc.'s stock price (NKE) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)